- #1

- 5

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Physonic
- Start date

- #1

- 5

- 0

- #2

- 277

- 2

The effective "lower limit" for speed will be the uncertainty principle, because of the wave-particle duality. The speed of a particle can be arbitrarily close to zero as long as the uncertainty in the position is sufficiently large (i.e. the particle is delocalized).

If a particle is confined to any discrete region of space, there will be a lower limit on its velocity. Hope this helps.

- #3

- 5

- 0

The effective "lower limit" for speed will be the uncertainty principle, because of the wave-particle duality. The speed of a particle can be arbitrarily close to zero as long as the uncertainty in the position is sufficiently large (i.e. the particle is delocalized).

If a particle is confined to any discrete region of space, there will be a lower limit on its velocity. Hope this helps.

Thank you that helped.

- #4

- 377

- 0

No, not at all.

The uncertainty principle applies for dXdP, not dXd(mv) which is a slight difference; in the case of light the uncertainty applies to its wavelength, frequency and energy via the relation P = hf/c where f is the frequency or alternatively, P = h/w where w is the wavelength.

Correct me if I'm wrong but that's how it seems.

The uncertainty principle applies for dXdP, not dXd(mv) which is a slight difference; in the case of light the uncertainty applies to its wavelength, frequency and energy via the relation P = hf/c where f is the frequency or alternatively, P = h/w where w is the wavelength.

Correct me if I'm wrong but that's how it seems.

Last edited:

- #5

- 277

- 2

dst : your point, thought true, is trivial and semantical. In quantum mechanics there is no way to define an instantaneous (accurate) velocity; however, the concept of spacial motion does apply very closely to momentum --> hence it is the term that we should be looking at, in the "lower limit of velocity."

Share: